В Кремле объяснили стремительное вымирание россиян
Extract from the author`s publications: Назад
Extract from the author`s publications:
1. P.A.Vertinskiy. Geoenvironmental problems of modern space-rocket activity IrGSKHA, Usole-Siberian Irkutsk, 2009 http://biblioteka-dzvon.narod.ru/docs/GEOEKOLOGIQ_-_PDF.mdi(file GEOECOLOGY-PDF - page 77):"

 

"...3. Since the only objective basis to determine the effect of spacecraft launches to natural disasters can only be the result of experiments, to ensure the purity of research you need to declare a global moratorium on the launching spacecraft from all spaceports, which is less than 72o latitude. It is known (see, for example, GS Khozin great confrontation in space (USSR - USA). Witnesses. M., "Veche", 2001 str.197 continue, etc.), now for launches spacecraft are 14 stationary and some mobile launch sites:

Kazakhstan: 1. Baykonur (43° with. Lat., 80° E),

Russia: 2. Kapustin Yar (with 47°. Lat., 32° E)

3. Plesetsk (65° s. Lat., 40° E)

4. Svobodny (50° c. W., 126° E)

5. "Odyssey" (floating cosmodrome)

6. "Ruslan" (air space launch) India:U.S.

7. Kanaverall (28° with. W., 82° W)

8. Vandenberg (28° with. W., 128° W)China:

9. Shuangentszy (41° with. W., 100° E)

10. Tayyuan (38° with. W., 112° E)

11. Sichan (28° with. W., 102° E)

Japan: 12. Kagasimo (45° s. Lat.)

13. Tanegashima (44° with. Lat.)

14. Shrihariota (13°s. sh., 80° E)

Australia: 15. Cape York (12° w. W.)

France: 16. Kourou (5° c. Lat.)

As this list of spaceports, only moving spaceports "Odyssey" and "Ruslan" may temporarily perform emergency load to ensure the work of existing space programs, including the provision of the ISS, if basing these mobile launch sites provide outside latitude 72o.

2. Vertinskiy PA: Magnetodynamic NATURE geomagnetism. http://www.econf.rae.ru/article/5051 (NATURE-page file. 32): "... At the same time, we have nothing object KE Tsiolkovsky that "the Earth - the cradle of humanity, but one can not eternally live in a cradle." Indeed, expiring 50 years of "space" era convincingly shown that mankind is doomed to access to space, to develop new spaces outside of his native land. Unfortunately, those same 50 years witnessed a unprecedented scale intervention in the Earth`s magnetosphere stationary machinery, shattered the established equilibrium of nature - climate processes, giving rise to devastating disasters of global proportions. To understand the root cause devastating our "exit" into space, we use the scheme again near space in Fig. 21 in the above-mentioned [21], which is reproduced in Fig. 6: Remember that all national space launch preferably based closer to equatorial latitudes. In other words, each space power prefers from energy considerations spacecraft is launched in their most economically Sovereign conditions ...

"Fig. 6. Near-Earth space.

3. Vertinskiy PA seismic models polyharmonic RESONANCE http://www.econf.rae.ru/article/5379 (SEYSMOMODELI file - page 10): "... 2. So how to fix impact of natural disasters can not (can not revive dead people, to repair damage), then the only way to protect people from the effects of disasters Earth can only prevention of these disasters, that is the very reason preventing disturbance of Earth`s magnetosphere by transferring all spaceports in the polar latitudes.

3. Since the only option for environmentally friendly accommodation space launch sites in the polar latitudes, renders meaningless the very existence of space and missile troops, the easiest way to space rocket disarmament is to give all the material and technical base and skills, all cosmic powers at the disposal of the polar space launch ... "



Док. 661839
Опублик.: 21.06.13
Число обращений: 0

  • Вертинский Павел Алексеевич

  • Разработчик Copyright © 2004-2019, Некоммерческое партнерство `Научно-Информационное Агентство `НАСЛЕДИЕ ОТЕЧЕСТВА``